Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Features Between Men and Women With Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Specialized Center in Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the frequency of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in women and to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences with respect to men at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of axSpA were included between 2017 and 2022 admitted to the "Reuma-check" SpA program. At baseline, all patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and human leukocyte antigen B27, and imaging (plain radiography [x-ray] and magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints, and ultrasound of heel entheses). All evaluators were blinded to the results of the other evaluations. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with a diagnosis of axSpA were included. The frequency in women at diagnosis was 61.55%. In the univariate analysis, the significant differences between women and men at diagnosis of axSpA were good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, elevated C-reactive protein, New York Criteria (+), enthesis ultrasound (+), years of education, number of swollen joints, erythrosedimentation rate, and the very low frequency of bone bridges in the magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints. In the logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable was "men," and the only feature that was independently associated was having radiographic compromise according to the New York criteria (odds ratio, 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency in women in our axSpA cohort was 61.55%, and clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences were observed. The difference that was independently associated was less radiographic compromise in women.

Ultrasound tenosynovitis: A differential feature of patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differential features between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: Prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted for polyarthralgia. At baseline was performed: laboratory studies, X-rays of hands and feet, ultrasound of both hands with power Doppler technique, clinical data and clinimetry. In subsequent visits the definitive diagnosis of RA was established or not. It was considered as seronegative RA when patients were negative for both RF and ACPAs. RESULTS: 746 patients were included, of which 128 (17.1%) ended with a final diagnosis of RA. Of these 128 patients, 87 (67.9%) were seropositive RA, while 41 (32%) were seronegative RA. The only feature that showed significant differences was the presence of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound with a positive power Doppler signal, 13.7% of the patients with seropositive RA vs 41.6% of the patients with seronegative RA (p=0.0028). CONCLUSION: The only differential feature of patients with seronegative RA was the higher proportion of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound.

Ultrasound tenosynovitis: A differential feature of patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis / Tenosinovitis ecográfica: una característica diferencial de pacientes con artritis reumatoide seronegativa

Objective: To identify differential features between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method: Prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted for polyarthralgia. At baseline was performed: laboratory studies, X-rays of hands and feet, ultrasound of both hands with power Doppler technique, clinical data and clinimetry. In subsequent visits the definitive diagnosis of RA was established or not. It was considered as seronegative RA when patients were negative for both RF and ACPAs. Results: 746 patients were included, of which 128 (17.1%) ended with a final diagnosis of RA. Of these 128 patients, 87 (67.9%) were seropositive RA, while 41 (32%) were seronegative RA. The only feature that showed significant differences was the presence of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound with a positive power Doppler signal, 13.7% of the patients with seropositive RA vs 41.6% of the patients with seronegative RA (p=0.0028). Conclusion: The only differential feature of patients with seronegative RA was the higher proportion of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound.(AU)

Objetivo: Identificar características diferenciales entre pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) seropositivos y seronegativos. Método: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo, incluyendo pacientes con poliartralgias. Al inicio se realizó: estudios de laboratorio, radiografías de manos y pies, ecografía de ambas manos con técnica power doppler, datos clínicos y clinimetría. En visitas posteriores se estableció o no el diagnóstico definitivo de AR. Se consideró AR seronegativa cuando los pacientes eran negativos tanto para factor reumatoide como para anticuerpos antipéptido cíclico citrulinado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 746 pacientes, de los cuales 128 (17,1%) terminaron con diagnóstico final de AR. De estos 128 pacientes, 87 (67,9%) eran AR seropositivos, mientras que 41 (32%) eran AR seronegativos.La única característica que mostró diferencias significativas fue la presencia de tenosinovitis detectada por ecografía con señal power doppler positiva, el 13,7% de los pacientes con AR seropositiva frente al 41,6% de los pacientes con AR seronegativa (p=0,0028). Conclusión: El único rasgo diferencial de los pacientes con AR seronegativa fue la mayor proporción de tenosinovitis detectadas por ecografía.(AU)

Psoriatic Arthritis: Differential Features at the Time of Clinical Presentation in a Large Cohort of Patients with Polyarthralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with psoriatic arthritis begin with cutaneous psoriasis, which is why all early detection strategies are based on screening in the dermatological consultation and referral to a rheu matologist. However, there are cases of patients who consult initially for musculoskeletal symptoms, mostly joint pain, regardless of family and/or personal history of psoriasis. This study aimed to esti mate the frequency of psoriatic arthritis in a cohort of patients who consulted for polyarthralgia and to determine the differential features, at the time of clinical presentation, in relation to both patients with final diagnosis other than psoriatic arthritis and patients with diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with polyarthralgia (including arthralgia of the hands) were included. Clinical examination, laboratory tests, ultrasound with power Doppler of both hands, and radiography of both hands and feet were performed at baseline. All patients were followed up and the definitive diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was established. RESULTS: A total of 1055 were included, 88 (8.3%) ended with diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was positively associated with a family history of psoriasis (odds ratio=4.14), pso riasis (odds ratio=78.94), radiographic erosions (odds ratio=5.74), and ultrasound with at least 1 joint with positive power Doppler (odds ratio=7.11). In comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was positively associated with psoriasis (odds ratio=433.42) and family history of psoriasis (odds ratio=41.63). On the other hand, it was negatively associated with positivity, for both rheumatoid factor (odds ratio=0.03) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (odds ratio=0.06). CONCLUSION: The frequency of psoriatic arthritis was 8.3% and was associated with a personal and/or family history of psoriasis, radiographic erosions, and inflammatory involvement by Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS). In comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, psoriatic arthritis was associated with a personal and/or family history of psoriasis, while the presence of both rheumatoid factor and/ or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies was shown to be a protective factor for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in South America. Burden of disease and differential features with respect to ankylosing spondylitis at time of diagnosis. A comprehensive analysis with a focus on images.

BACKGROUND: Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) data from South America are scarce, especially regarding image features. Objective To estimate the frequency of nr-axSpA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a cohort of Argentinian patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) and to analyze the difference between both, with focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, at diagnosis. METHODS: Patients with LBP and a diagnosis of axSpA who participated in a reuma-check program were included. All patients with a suspicion of SpA were evaluated using blood analytics, HLA-B27, and images (MRI). Sociodemographic data, SpA features, diagnostic dela,y and clinimetrics were assessed by an operator who was blinded to the patient's test results. On MRI, the presence of SpA lesions was assessed and a concordance exercise was carried out between rheumatologists and radiologist. RESULT: Of 198 LBP patients, 97 had axSpA, 54% of whom were nr-axSpA. A positive MRI was found in 50%. No difference in terms of disease activity, functional impact, laboratory or treatments between nr-axSpA and AS were found. Higher frequencies of male sex and chronic lesions on sacroiliac MRI were found in AS patients. In the logistic regression, an independent association with AS diagnosis was found: male (odds ratio [OR] 4.8), MRI fat replacement (OR 4.6), MRI sclerosis (OR 7.6), and diagnostic delay of more than 2 years (OR 10). The concordance between rheumatologists and radiologists was considered good to very good (κ 0.7-0.8). CONCLUSION: The frequency of nr-axSpA was 54%. We found a higher frequency of being male, more SpA features, and a longer diagnostic delay in patients with AS. Patients with AS had more structural lesions, with a good concordance between rheumatologist and radiologist.

"Reuma-Check": Performance of a Comprehensive Fast-Track Program for the Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis in South America.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a comprehensive diagnosis program called "Reuma-check" for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Patients with LBP aged 18 years or older were preselected, and those with at least 1 SpA feature completed the circuit. They were referred after 2 strategies: education for orthopedists and a campaign on social networks. All patients underwent a clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, and imaging (including human leukocyte antigen B27 evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging). The diagnosis of axial SpA was established by an expert rheumatologist opinion. Time from onset of symptoms to "Reuma-check," time from patient referral to admission of the checkup, and time from "Reuma-check" to diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 175 of 246 patients were included, most of them came from the social media campaign (55%). Seventy-five (43%) of 175 patients were diagnosed as axial SpA. The median time from referral (or self-referral) to access to the program was 1.3 months. The median time from symptoms onset to access to the program was 31.7 months, and the median time from the performance of "Reuma-check" to final diagnosis was 2 weeks. Features associated with a diagnosis of axial SpA were as follows: inflammatory LBP (odds ratio [OR], 6.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-28), clinical enthesopathy (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.1-18.4), positive human leukocyte antigen B27 (OR, 23.02; 95% CI, 3.5-58), and positive magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 14.34; 95% CI, 3.5-58). CONCLUSIONS: "Reuma-check" allowed a high frequency of axial SpA diagnosis and improved access to rapid diagnosis, shortening the time from referral to diagnosis with a shorter acquisition time for the ancillary studies. Patients with a final diagnosis of axial SpA presented distinctive features.

Recognition of spondyloarthritis lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Results of an educational intervention.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), allowing us an earlier diagnosis of the disease compared to radiography. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of a recognition test on SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after carrying out an educational intervention (hands-on workshop). We also evaluated whether the successes in the tests were associated with the individual characteristics of the participants. METHODS: A test was carried out involving 10 questions (seven for image recognition and three for theoretical knowledge) before and after the attendance to an MRI workshop in SpA performed in different cities in Argentina. The number of correct answers was assessed before and after the workshop; good performance was defined as the achievement of 6 correct answers on average between the pre- and post-test. Participants' characteristics were collected. RESULTS: A total of 106 participants were evaluated. Average of correct answers before and after the workshop were 5.3 and 6.8, respectively (P = .0001); 65% of participants achieved good performance. Performance is not associated with the characteristics of trained physicians. CONCLUSION: MRI training workshops in SpA allow rheumatologists to improve recognition of acute inflammatory and structural lesions. The long-term effects of such training need further evaluation.

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Does MRI training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists on the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más de 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuestas correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuestas correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct).

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Do magnetic resonance training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists for the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más e 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuesta correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuesta correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct)